|
from Medical Issues
Two New Studies Describe Gay Barebacking, Circuit Parties, And Spread of HIV
Researchers have surveyed the attitudes of gay males engaging in unprotected
sex and the ideology behind extensive drug use and multiple sex partners at gay
circuit parties.
August 29, 2005 -
A study published in the August, 2005 edition of the Journal of Sex Research,
and one in the Journal of the International Association of Physicians In AIDS
Care [JIAPAC] (Vol. 4. No. 2, 32-46, 2005) describe the attitudes of individuals
who engage in unprotected anal sex (barebacking) and those who use drugs and
engage in multiple sex activities at gay circuit parties throughout the United
States.
Northwestern University doctoral candidate Amin Ghaziani and Thomas D. Cook,
Ph.D. wrote "Reducing HIV Infecitons at Circuit Parties: From Description to
Explanation and Principles of Intervention Design" for JIAPAC.
The authors describe circuit parties as weekend-long erotically charged
"drug-prevalent dance events attended by up to 25,000 self-identified gay and
bisexual men who socialize and dance nonstop, sometimes for 24 hours or longer."
Ghaziani and Cook state that circuit parties originally began as AIDS awareness
events in the mid-80s, but "Although it is unconfirmed, circuit parties may have
ironically become potential sites for HIV serotransmission." They maintain that
the idea of a link between circuit parties and HIV transmission is "not
unfounded, even if it remains speculative."
They note that as many as 25% of the circuit party attendees admit they are HIV
positive and use crystal meth as well as ecstasy in risky sexual behaviors.
Most circuit party attendees (95%) admit using psychoactive drugs. Of these, 61%
ingested three or more drugs in one night. In addition, 67% reported engaging in
anal or oral sex. Only 21% reported engaging in "safe anal sex." Twenty-nine
percent had multiple sex partners during a weekend. Of these, 47% reported
unprotected anal intercourse (UAI).
Reasons for attending circuit parties varied with 97% saying they wanted to
attend to "celebrate and have fun"; 68% wanted "to be wild and uninhibited"; 43%
said they wanted sex; and 14% wanted to "forget about HIV/AIDS."
The authors noted that the use of crystal meth at circuit parties is at epidemic
proportions.
They propose a causal model that explains the process used by gays at circuit
parties who engage in unprotected sex. One part of this model includes elevated
libido and the use of drugs that distort judgment. They say: "We posit three
mediating mechanisms between party attendance and unsafe sex. One is
pharmacological, because club drugs play a central role in risky sexual activity
at parties.... Social psychologists have long known that large groups can reduce a
person's sense of self and that such de-individuation can loosen normative
behavioral and moral constraints .... The final mediating mechanism has to do with
feelings of social connectedness and the search for community, experienced at
the individual level."
Ghaziani and Cook observe that "Participants report become so immersed in the
party atmosphere that they forget about the immediate threat of HIV/AIDS or no
longer care about it. They feel invincible and engage in situationally
sanctioned practices they would otherwise avoid."
Intervention Strategies
The researchers propose several intervention strategies to reduce the likelihood
that HIV infections will occur at circuit parties. One is an educational
campaign to explain how different cocktail drugs can "affect cognitive
distortion and libidos and hence unsafe sex. Our assumptions are that it is not
possible to halt drug use at parties and that the real need is to reeducate and
reduce the impact of those drugs that most distort judgment about sexual
behavior."
A second approach is to promote and sustain the use of condoms by circuit party
attendees. This would include educational efforts by circuit party leaders and
hotels catering to party goers.
A third approach is to provide lighting in the outermost portions of the dance
floor in order to discourage the "most frenetic encounters that occur at the
height of stimulation." The goal is not to discourage anal intercourse, but to
encourage it in hotel rooms where gay partners will have a "little more time to
reflect on and perhaps even negotiate what they are doing and to distance
themselves from the overly eroticized cues and loud music on and around the
dance floor."
A fourth approach is to recruit "groups of young men from different cities who
are willing to individuate themselves at a particular party (eg., by wearing
different clothes from the party 'uniform') and who will then use this
situational salience to represent safer sex positions." They will be available
to discuss safe sex with participants at circuit parties.
The authors conclude: "Circuit parties are community-building and
profit-generating events, and short of legally closing them, they are not likely
to go away. Attempts to ban alcohol, prostitution, drugs, and rave parties teach
us that moralistic and demonizing legislation only drives such activities
underground and may even exacerbate the risk contained with them."
Barebacking And AIDS
John Maxwell, writing in "AIDS optimism, condom fatigue, or self-esteem?
Explaining unsafe sex among gay and bisexual men," for the Journal of Sex
Research conducted a study of 102 high-risk gay and bisexual men in Toronto. The
study was designed to discover the reasoning processes used by these men in
engaging in unsafe sex.
Maxwell notes that three key theories have been hypothesized to explain why Men
Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) are engaging in unsafe sex: AIDS optimism, condom
fatigue, and low self-esteem.
This study "seeks to investigate how well widely-circulating explanations
accounting for unsafe sex engage with the social circumstances and reasoning
processes of men in their sexual relationships. It examines, in particular,
narratives of men who have abandoned condom use altogether and employ a language
of barebacking to describe their practices."
Maxwell's study found that many gays engage in unsafe practices because they're
in "heat of the moment" situations or in "trade-off" situations where they do
not want to offend their sexual partner. These men "trade away safe sex lest it
prove an obstacle to sexual interaction."
In addition, personal turmoil and depression are also factors involved in unsafe
sex. Individuals who do not believe life is worth living are more likely to
engage in practices that expose them to HIV infection.
Maxwell also notes that unprotected sex occurs intentionally. He notes that a
minority of HIV-positive men (10) in the study revealed their HIV status right
away as a warning to prospective partners. Many HIV positive males considered
condom use not needed with other HIV positive partners but wanted to make sure
HIV negative partners used condoms with them.
The author notes that "one of the most consistent findings in HIV research is
the tendency of couples, whether homosexual or heterosexual, to shift away from
safe sex over time."
He also notes that "Monogamy may work... as a safeguard for some couples against
HIV transmission, but it can also act as a semiotic snare, setting up the
conditions whereby vulnerability to HIV may be increased."
Maxwell says that no one in his study indicated willingness or acceptance of
knowingly infecting a partner: "When the premises of individual responsibility
are knowingly absent, many express a strong reluctance to allow unprotected
sex."
He says that the San Francisco AIDS Foundation has pioneered a program to
address the "fundamental problem related to the emergency of a barebacker
microculture." The "assumptions campaign" urges men to question their
assumptions and to reinforce the use of condoms with men of unknown HIV status.
According to Maxwell, there is need for further research on prevention
alternatives to condoms such as microbicides and vaccines and the need to
challenge the stigma and rejection of people living with HIV. He also suggests
that there is a need "to depict men drawn from a greater diversity of ages and
ethnocultural backgrounds as desirable to diminish the power of beauty
hierarchies that influence men to 'trade off' safe sex."
Additional Reading: "The Health Risks Of Gay Sex," by John R. Diggs,
Jr., M.D. "A Psychoanalyst's Perspective: AIDS And The Death Wish," by Gerald
Schoenewolf, Ph.D., NARTH Scientific Advisory Board Member.
Updated: 2 September 2008
|